- MemoryVision.md: New major section 'Profiles 1–3: Definitions and cya Integration Plans' with crisp, self-contained definitions for each profile (intent, core loop, cya mapping, delta, phase-memory fit, safety/explainability) + full 'Profile Capability Matrix' table.
- Added short appendix in the workplan itself ('Profile Definitions Reference (T03)') pointing to MemoryVision as the living spec.
- All content synthesized from the persisted research artifact with heavy references.
- T03 acceptance criteria fully met (definitions + matrix in MemoryVision + workplan note; docs-only).
Committed as ralph iter 3. Next: T04 (phase-memory suggestions doc polish).
- New section after Success Criteria, before 0002 contract.
- References the persisted research doc (history/2026-05-28-CYA-Agentic-Memory-Research-Variations.md).
- Short outline of Profiles 1 (Reflexion verbal), 2 (hierarchical synthesis), 3 (procedural/meta-policy) + how they build on Profile 0 + 0003 retrospect/activation.
- Forward links to T02 (Profile 0 baseline) and T03 (full defs + matrix) in the workplan.
- Addresses several Open Questions from the vision.
- T01 task block updated to done in workplan.
Per ralph-workplan for CYA-WP-0005. Next: T02 formalize Profile 0.
- Persist deep research on self-improving loops (Reflexion, Generative Agents, procedural/meta-policy) as history/2026-05-28-CYA-Agentic-Memory-Research-Variations.md
- Create CYA-WP-0005 workplan (proposed): baseline current memory as Profile 0, define Profiles 1-3 mapping the three variations, with tasks for docs, optional Profile 1 spike, tests/safety, and explicit T04 for phase-memory suggestions deliverable
- Add standalone sister-repo feedback doc docs/phase-memory-optimization-suggestions.md (9 prioritized categories: ports/activation, synthesis hooks, procedural support, retrieval, lifecycle, explainability, safety, observability, retrospection interop)
- All per explicit 2026-05-28 request: 'Persist the research. Create a workplan to establish the current memory handling as profile 0 and add profile 1-3. For interface optimization and missing functionality in phase-memory provide optimization suggestions to the sister repo. Commit register and sync the workplan.'
- Follows AGENTS.md: small inspectable change, references prior 0002/0003/0004 + MemoryVision + post-0004 gap analysis
- Next: register workstream, seed IDs, make fix-consistency, progress event (self-exec per prior authorization pattern)
Artifacts ready for State Hub registration and sister-repo handoff.
New workplan: Memory Integration Roadmap — moving from the thin T05 no-op ports toward real, profile-driven phase-memory integration.
Directly addresses the primary gap identified in the recent Intent-vs-Scope analysis and the new MemoryVision.md.
Refs: MemoryVision.md, CYA-WP-0001, history/2026-05-26 gap analysis
- New MemoryVision.md outlining long-term vision for phase-memory integration in cya (profiles, phases, lifecycle, ports)
- Persisted full Intent-vs-Scope gap analysis in history/
- Updated SCOPE.md to reflect post-MVP reality and MemoryVision direction
- Minor cross-references in AGENTS.md and the CYA-WP-0001 workplan
This lays the foundation for the next workplan (CYA-WP-0002) focused on realizing the MemoryVision.
Refs: MemoryVision.md, history/2026-05-26-CYA-Intent-Scope-Gap-Analysis.md, CYA-WP-0001 T05/T08
- Frontmatter: status `ready` → `active`
- Added "Status Update — 2026-05-26 (Activated)" section documenting
the resolved stack choices and the specific direction on T03 (safety)
and T05 (phase-memory).
- Annotated the T03 and T05 task descriptions with the operator's
explicit guidance (rule-based risk assessment first + ADR requirement;
strictly minimal no-op ports for memory).
- Linked the resolved State Hub Decision `a644364b-11c4-49a9-bf17-99063382e27b`.
- Updated Current Evidence to reflect bootstrap completion and activation.
This authorizes implementation of the narrow console-native MVP slice
to begin (starting with T01).
Resolves: State Hub Decision D1 (now `resolved`)
